Sartre

His birthday is June 21, so one day late is not too bad:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-aBxQCmu5Q[/youtube]



And Critique de la raison dialectique (both volumes)

Tags: , , ,
Subscribe to Comments RSS Feed in this post

2 Responses

  1. What do you think accounts for Sartre’s intense popularity in american academy, and then strong reaction against Sartre (and the feeling that he was passe) and now this move towards a revitalization of Sartre?
    Or maybe I have it wrong about how Sartre has been perceived in the american academy.

  2. That is a question that I often ask myself. I think that the initial popularity is not hard to understand. Sartre was popular all over the world. The advent of post-structuralism changed things and the usual – and probably correct – interpretation tells us that Sartre was passe based on this new philosophy. I don’t buy it entirely.

    Post-structuralism is mostly a French phenomenon. I think it is difficult to fully appreciate how big Sartre was in France and this new wave of philosophy avoided Sartre altogether. They did not even attempt patricide; they just left the Sartrean house altogether. You have Foucault say some nasty things about Sartrean subjectivity (and he’s got it all wrong); Derrida avoided Sartre like the plague even though he talked about pretty much anyone under the sun. Those who were influenced by him – Lacan and Levinas for instance – did not give him much credit (partly because it was assumed that everyone knows where they’re coming from).

    American post-structuralism ignored these problems and overplayed the rejection of Sartre by Foucault and Derrida.

    The revitalization, it seems to me, has its roots in 1) re-reading the text to begin with and seeing, as Nik Fox and may others have argued, that Sartre shares a great deal with the post-structuralists. 2) In Sartre’s work on race and postcolonialism, stuff that is now popular and 3) I genuinely believe that Sartre’s emphasis on freedom and liberation is a breath of French air against the heavily localized and sometimes confusing post-structuralist political philosophy.