<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Book Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.continental-philosophy.org/2008/06/03/book-review-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.continental-philosophy.org/2008/06/03/book-review-3/</link>
	<description>A Bulletin Board for Continental Philosophy, History of Philosophy and Moreâ€¦</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:11:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Philosophy book reader</title>
		<link>http://www.continental-philosophy.org/2008/06/03/book-review-3/comment-page-1/#comment-48594</link>
		<dc:creator>Philosophy book reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.continental-philosophy.org/?p=775#comment-48594</guid>
		<description>Excellent points! I remember reading most of Nietzsche&#039;s works one summer and noticing this compared to the other philosophy writers, especially the Americans with their pragmatism. It is a solid argument, for you have to bring the reader into the argument emotionally if you want to change their belief or values around a certain topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points! I remember reading most of Nietzsche&#8217;s works one summer and noticing this compared to the other philosophy writers, especially the Americans with their pragmatism. It is a solid argument, for you have to bring the reader into the argument emotionally if you want to change their belief or values around a certain topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
