<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Book Review: Ranciere&#8217;s Politics of Aesthetics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.continental-philosophy.org/2007/06/06/book-review-rancieres-politics-of-aesthetics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.continental-philosophy.org/2007/06/06/book-review-rancieres-politics-of-aesthetics/</link>
	<description>A Bulletin Board for Continental Philosophy, History of Philosophy and Moreâ€¦</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:11:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Landscape Agency</title>
		<link>http://www.continental-philosophy.org/2007/06/06/book-review-rancieres-politics-of-aesthetics/comment-page-1/#comment-34294</link>
		<dc:creator>Landscape Agency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 10:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.continental-philosophy.org/2007/06/06/book-review-rancieres-politics-of-aesthetics/#comment-34294</guid>
		<description>Read your critique of the Politics of Aesthetics and must say that Truth will never be found outside the Art object or the Subject ... It is an internal Real, versus anything heterogeneous and rizomatic or originary ... I suppose this is
 Rancière&#039;s point, though I think you say/write he
 never quite gets there ... The de-centering of the
 subject (and its various iterations, manifestations
 today in theory and praxis) is a huge red herring ... Words matter because they are the most prescient form of image ... Writing is therefore Truth (when it says the unsayable) ... &quot;What cannot be said must not be silenced [...]&quot; J-L Marion ... GK ... So, J-L Nancy has a new book forthcoming from Fordham on deconstructing Christianity (entitled Dis-Enclosure)
 ... &#039;Here&#039; is an Event after Truth ... Not that Truth
 is to be found merely in Theology ... But one reason theology is the hot subject right now is because it goes where metaphysics could/can not go (i.e., &#039;inside/upstream&#039;, or, through the wall/looking glass to the Imaginary Itself) ...

- Landscape Agency

http://www.geocities.com/ateliermp/

/S/O(MA) - /S/yntactical Operations (Metaphorical Affects)
 GK / LANY - GK / Landscape Agency New York / Etcetera</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read your critique of the Politics of Aesthetics and must say that Truth will never be found outside the Art object or the Subject &#8230; It is an internal Real, versus anything heterogeneous and rizomatic or originary &#8230; I suppose this is<br />
 Rancière&#8217;s point, though I think you say/write he<br />
 never quite gets there &#8230; The de-centering of the<br />
 subject (and its various iterations, manifestations<br />
 today in theory and praxis) is a huge red herring &#8230; Words matter because they are the most prescient form of image &#8230; Writing is therefore Truth (when it says the unsayable) &#8230; &#8220;What cannot be said must not be silenced [...]&#8221; J-L Marion &#8230; GK &#8230; So, J-L Nancy has a new book forthcoming from Fordham on deconstructing Christianity (entitled Dis-Enclosure)<br />
 &#8230; &#8216;Here&#8217; is an Event after Truth &#8230; Not that Truth<br />
 is to be found merely in Theology &#8230; But one reason theology is the hot subject right now is because it goes where metaphysics could/can not go (i.e., &#8216;inside/upstream&#8217;, or, through the wall/looking glass to the Imaginary Itself) &#8230;</p>
<p>- Landscape Agency</p>
<p>http://www.geocities.com/ateliermp/</p>
<p>/S/O(MA) &#8211; /S/yntactical Operations (Metaphorical Affects)<br />
 GK / LANY &#8211; GK / Landscape Agency New York / Etcetera</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
